Simpson v. Norris, No. 06-2823
In a death penalty case, denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is vacated and remanded where the district court erred in holding that petitioner had defaulted an eighth amendment claim under Atkins that his mental retardation made him ineligible for the death penalty. Re
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Death Penalty, mental retardation
Labels:
constitutional right,
criminal law,
evidence,
Habeas Corpus,
procedure,
sentencing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment